News
Read about the progress we’re making across the mortgage and real estate services industry.
07/10/2014
Radian Provides Comment on Proposed GSE Requirements for Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility
-- Extended transition period of more than two years to comply with PMIERs’ financial requirements --
-- Radian expects ability to comply within the transition period without a need to raise external capital --
-- Company to address several aspects of draft requirements during public comment period, including those that could increase homebuyer costs and restrict credit access --
“Radian fully supports the need for strong counterparties to
The proposed PMIERs reflect limited initial input from Radian. The
company will provide additional commentary to the FHFA on several areas
of the proposed PMIERs during the public comment period, which is
expected to end on
The company’s comments will also outline how the proposed PMIERs are inconsistent with the FHFA’s stated goal of expanding access to mortgage credit and reducing taxpayer risk by increasing the role of private capital in the mortgage market.
Bazemore added, “We look forward to continuing our dialogue with the
FHFA and the GSEs as they gather input on the PMIERs. We are proud of
our strong working relationship that was also in place as Radian met all
of its obligations during the greatest economic stress in our company’s
history, paid more than
Radian will host a conference call at
TIMEFRAME AND EXPECTATION FOR COMPLIANCE
After the public comment period ends, the FHFA is expected to review and
consider input before publishing the final PMIERs. All aspects of the
PMIERs are expected to become effective 180 days after their final
publication. Approved insurers will be given an extended transition
period of up to two years from the final publication date to be in
compliance with the financial requirements of the PMIERs. Based upon an
estimated final publication date of the end of 2014, Radian expects a
transition period through
Radian remains an eligible mortgage insurer with the GSEs and expects to be able to fully comply with the PMIERs within the transition period. The company has
-
approximately
$800 million of currently available liquidity; -
the potential to monetize or utilize its financial guaranty business,
which had
$1.2 billion of statutory capital and an additional$376 million in claims-paying resources as ofMarch 31, 2014 ; and - the potential to leverage various other options, if needed, including external reinsurance.
Radian Asset received approval from the
Ibrahim continued, “We do believe that these proposed requirements, if not modified, have the potential to increase the cost of borrowing for future homebuyers, and could also restrict access to credit. This may impact many low- to moderate-income, deserving borrowers, including certain minority groups, who are particularly vulnerable today based on lower credit scores and limited savings for a downpayment.”
CONFERENCE CALL
Radian will discuss the proposed PMIERs in a call today, starting at
A replay of the webcast will be available on the Radian website approximately two hours after the live broadcast ends for a period of one year. A replay of the conference call will be available approximately two hours after the call ends for a period of thirty days, using the following dial-in numbers and passcode: 800-475-6701 inside the U.S., or 320-365-3844 for international callers, passcode 331702.
ABOUT RADIAN
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All statements in this press release that address events, developments
or results that we expect or anticipate may occur in the future are
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and
- changes in general economic and political conditions, including unemployment rates, changes in the U.S. housing and mortgage credit markets (including declines in home prices and property values), the performance of the U.S. or global economies, the amount of liquidity in the capital or credit markets, changes or volatility in interest rates or consumer confidence and changes in credit spreads, all of which may be impacted by, among other things, legislative activity or inactivity, actual or threatened downgrades of U.S. government credit ratings, or actual or threatened defaults on U.S. government obligations;
- changes in the way customers, investors, regulators or legislators perceive the strength of private mortgage insurers or financial guaranty providers, in particular in light of the fact that certain of our former competitors have ceased writing new insurance business and have been placed under supervision or receivership by insurance regulators;
- catastrophic events, municipal and sovereign or sub-sovereign bankruptcy filings or other economic changes in geographic regions where our mortgage insurance exposure is more concentrated or where we have financial guaranty exposure;
- our ability to maintain sufficient holding company liquidity to meet our short- and long-term liquidity needs;
- a reduction in, or prolonged period of depressed levels of, home mortgage originations due to reduced liquidity in the lending market, tighter underwriting standards, or general reduced housing demand in the U.S., which may be exacerbated by regulations impacting home mortgage originations, including requirements established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”);
-
our ability to maintain an adequate risk-to-capital position, minimum
policyholder position and other surplus requirements for
Radian Guaranty Inc. (“Radian Guaranty”), our principal mortgage insurance subsidiary, and an adequate minimum policyholder position and surplus for our insurance subsidiaries that provide reinsurance or capital support to Radian Guaranty; -
Radian Guaranty’s ability to comply with proposed Private Mortgage
Insurance Eligibility Requirements (“PMIERs”) within the applicable
transition period, which may require us to contribute substantially
all of our holding company cash and investments to Radian Guaranty,
and also could depend on our ability to: (1) successfully monetize
Radian Asset, a direct subsidiary of Radian Guaranty, or otherwise
utilize the capital in Radian Asset such that we are provided credit
for such capital under the PMIERs; and (2) obtain reinsurance for a
portion of our mortgage insurance risk-in-force in a manner that is
compliant with the PMIERS. The amount of capital or capital relief
that may be required to comply with the PMIERs also may be impacted by
the performance of our mortgage insurance business, including the
losses we incur and the amount of new business we write, among other
factors. Contributing a significant portion of our holding company
cash and investments to Radian Guaranty would leave
Radian Group with less liquidity to satisfy its obligations, and we may not be successful in monetizing or otherwise utilizing the capital of Radian Asset or in obtaining reinsurance for our mortgage insurance risk-in-force on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all. In the event we are unable to successfully execute these or similar transactions or strategies, or such transactions are not available on terms that are acceptable to us, we may be required or decide to seek additional capital by incurring additional debt, by issuing additional equity, or by selling assets, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms, if at all. The ultimate form of the PMIERs and the timeframe for their implementation remain uncertain; - our ability to continue to effectively mitigate our mortgage insurance and financial guaranty losses;
-
a more rapid than expected decrease in the levels of mortgage
insurance rescissions and claim denials, which have reduced our paid
losses and resulted in a significant reduction in our loss reserves,
including a decrease in net rescissions or denials resulting from an
increase in the number of successful challenges to previously
rescinded policies or claim denials (including as part of one or more
settlements of disputed rescissions or denials), or by
Fannie Mae orFreddie Mac (the “Government-Sponsored Enterprises” or the “GSEs”) intervening in or otherwise limiting our loss mitigation practices, including settlements of disputes regarding loss mitigation activities; - the negative impact that our loss mitigation activities may have on our relationships with our customers and potential customers, including the potential loss of current or future business and the heightened risk of disputes and litigation;
- the need, in the event that we are unsuccessful in defending our loss mitigation activities, to increase our loss reserves for, and reassume risk on, rescinded or cancelled loans or denied claims, and to pay additional claims, including amounts previously curtailed;
- any disruption in the servicing of mortgages covered by our insurance policies, as well as poor servicer performance;
- adverse changes in the severity or frequency of losses associated with certain products that we formerly offered (and which remain a small part of our insured portfolio) that are riskier than traditional mortgage insurance or financial guaranty insurance policies;
- a substantial decrease in the persistency rates of our mortgage insurance policies, which has the effect of reducing our premium income on our monthly premium policies and could decrease the profitability of our mortgage insurance business;
-
heightened competition for our mortgage insurance business from others
such as the
Federal Housing Administration , theU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and other private mortgage insurers, including with respect to other private mortgage insurers, those that have been assigned higher ratings than we have, that may have access to greater amounts of capital than we do, that are less dependent on capital support from their subsidiaries than we are or that are new entrants to the industry, and therefore, are not burdened by legacy obligations; - changes in the charters or business practices of, or rules or regulations applicable to, the GSEs;
- changes to the current system of housing finance, including the possibility of a new system in which private mortgage insurers are not required or their products are significantly limited in effect or scope;
- the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on the financial services industry in general, and on our mortgage insurance and financial guaranty businesses in particular, including whether and to what extent loans with private mortgage insurance may be considered “qualified residential mortgages” for purposes of the Dodd-Frank Act securitization provisions;
-
the application of existing federal or state laws and regulations, or
changes in these laws and regulations or the way they are interpreted,
including, without limitation: (i) the resolution of existing, or the
possibility of additional, lawsuits or investigations (including in
particular investigations and litigation relating to captive
reinsurance arrangements under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act of 1974); (ii) changes to the Mortgage Guaranty Insurers Model Act
(the “Model Act”) being considered by the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) that could include more stringent capital and other requirements for Radian Guaranty in states that adopt the new Model Act in the future; and (iii) legislative and regulatory changes (a) impacting the demand for private mortgage insurance, (b) limiting or restricting the products we may offer or increasing the amount of capital we are required to hold, (c) affecting the form in which we execute credit protection, or (d) otherwise impacting our existing businesses or future prospects; -
the amount and timing of potential payments or adjustments associated
with federal or other tax examinations, including adjustments proposed
by the
Internal Revenue Service resulting from the examination of our 2000 through 2007 tax years, which we are currently contesting; - the possibility that we may fail to estimate accurately the likelihood, magnitude and timing of losses in connection with establishing loss reserves for our mortgage insurance or financial guaranty businesses, or to estimate accurately the fair value amounts of derivative instruments in determining gains and losses on these instruments;
- volatility in our earnings caused by changes in the fair value of our assets and liabilities carried at fair value, including our derivative instruments, substantially all of our investment portfolio and certain of our long-term incentive compensation awards;
- our ability to realize some or all of the tax benefits associated with our gross deferred tax assets, which will depend, in part, on our ability to generate sufficient sustainable taxable income in future periods;
-
changes in accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America or statutory accounting principles, rules and guidance, or their interpretation; - legal and other limitations on amounts we may receive from our subsidiaries as dividends or through our tax- and expense-sharing arrangements with our subsidiaries; and
-
our ability to fully realize the benefits anticipated from our recent
acquisition of
Clayton Holdings LLC (“Clayton”), including: as a result of a loss of customers and/or employees or the potential inability to successfully incorporate Clayton’s business intoRadian Group ; and the potential distraction of management time and attention in connection with the post-acquisition process.
For more information regarding these risks and uncertainties as well as
certain additional risks that we face, you should refer to the Risk
Factors detailed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended
Source:
Radian Group Inc.
Emily Riley, 215-231-1035
emily.riley@radian.com